motionveo
Comparison

Veo 3.1 vs Seedance 2.0 vs Wan 2.6.

All three labels currently expose the same core fields in MotionVeo's dated catalog snapshot: 1080p, 8 seconds, 16:9 or 9:16, source images, first-frame support, and up to seven reference images. That makes this a capability comparison, not a quality ranking.

Searchers often ask which model is “best,” but a catalog table cannot answer a visual quality question by itself. It can answer a more useful first question: which settings are available for the kind of scene you are trying to make?

At-a-glance comparison

Current MotionVeo video catalog snapshot
Catalog labelResolutionDurationRatiosInputs
Veo 3.1 Fast1080p8 seconds16:9, 9:16Source image; first frame; up to 7 references
Seedance 2.01080p8 seconds16:9, 9:16Source image; first frame; up to 7 references
Wan 2.61080p8 seconds16:9, 9:16Source image; first frame; up to 7 references

What the shared fields mean

1080p and an eight-second clip

Each of these three catalog labels currently lists 1080p and an eight-second duration. That is useful for planning a short scene, storyboard beat, or social cut. It does not tell you whether a particular prompt will preserve identity, render text cleanly, or produce a stable camera move.

16:9 and 9:16

The shared ratios cover the two most common delivery shapes. Choose the destination first. A landscape prompt often benefits from a wider environment; a vertical prompt needs a clear central subject and enough headroom for a tall crop.

Source, first-frame, and references

The current catalog lists all three input types for these labels, with up to seven reference images. Use references to keep a visual direction consistent, but do not assume that more references always improve a result. Start with the smallest set that answers the visual question.

How to choose a starting model

Because the listed fields are identical, choose based on the result of a small, fair test rather than a headline. Use the same prompt, ratio, source image, and reference set for each available label. Compare the one property that matters to the project: subject stability, camera behavior, composition, or motion continuity. Keep the winning prompt and settings documented so the comparison is reproducible.

A fair test

  1. Write one prompt with one visible action.
  2. Use the same 16:9 or 9:16 ratio for every render.
  3. Use the same source and reference images, if any.
  4. Inspect the full clip, not just the first frame.
  5. Record what failed before changing the next prompt.

Important naming caveat

The upstream catalog currently exposes display labels and provider-facing identifiers that do not always match. MotionVeo pages use the user-facing labels shown in Studio and do not expose opaque IDs as SEO claims. The page for Veo 3.1 Fast should not be read as a claim about a separate “Veo 3” product, and this comparison does not claim access to Grok, GPT-2, or any model absent from the catalog.

Bottom line

There is no defensible universal winner from the current fields alone. Start with the label that is enabled for your account, run a controlled prompt test, and choose the output that fits the shot. Recheck the AI video generator hub before a paid render because availability can change.